<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>www.ritlabs.com [Topic: Address Book Hierachy &amp; Macros]</title>
		<link>http://www.ritlabs.com</link>
		<description>New posts in Address Book Hierachy &amp; Macros of  forum at www.ritlabs.com [www.ritlabs.com]</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss2</docs>
		<lastBuildDateTag>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:02:06 +0300</lastBuildDateTag>		<item>
			<title>Address Book Hierachy &amp; Macros</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic1230/message5311/">Address Book Hierachy &amp; Macros</a></b> in forum <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/">The Bat! - Templates and Macros</a>. <br />
			Hmmm. In a word ... no.<br /><br />Groups are part of the infrastructure of The Bat! and should be considered for implementation strategies, mostly because of their usefulness in filtering.<br /><br />Yes, there is a %TO='...' macro.<br />Yes, there are Address book related macros, but they are more suited to getting extra information from the address book record, using one of these parts as the index:<br /><br />TO	use the address entry for the TO addressee of the current message	<br />OFROM	use the address entry for the FROM address of the original message	<br />OREPLY	use the address entry for the REPLY-TO address of the original message	<br />OTO	use the address entry for the TO addressee of the original message	<br />FROM	use the address entry for the FROM address of the current message	<br />REPLY	use the address entry for the REPLY-TO address of the current message	<br /><br />So - I don't quite see how that would fit in with your intended scheme.<br /><br />If you were <B>really</B> ambitious, I suppose you could write your own addressing index system using a series of flat files and regex lookups to access the right one then use the %AB macros to index further information from the full address book record. <br />
			<i>26 April 2005 14:02:06, <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/">Marck Pearlstone</a>.</i>]]></description>
			<link>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic1230/message5311/</link>
			<guid>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic1230/message5311/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:02:06 +0300</pubDate>
			<category>The Bat! - Templates and Macros</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Address Book Hierachy &amp; Macros</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic1230/message5154/">Address Book Hierachy &amp; Macros</a></b> in forum <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/">The Bat! - Templates and Macros</a>. <br />
			I'm new to The Bat!, but so far I'm pretty excited to be using it. It's just what I've been looking for (for the last 15 years :-).<br /><br />Here's what I want to do:<br /><br />I want to be able to organize my address books and individual entries in a hierarchy that is independent of the address book groups.<br /><br />Here's what I mean:<br /><br />CompanyA (handle = ca)<br /> &nbsp; Sales (handle = sales)<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; John Doe (handle = jd)<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Jane Jones (handle = jj)<br />CompanyB (handle = cb)<br /> &nbsp; Sales (handle = sales)<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;John Doe Jr. (handle = jd)<br /><br />In this case handles only need to be unique within the hierarchical level of the address book that they're in.<br /><br />Then in a macro I want to be able to say something like:<br /><br />%To = Get Address Book(handle = ca.sales.jj)<br /><br />Is this possible with The Bat?<br /><br />Thanks,<br />Frank.<br /> <br />
			<i>15 April 2005 15:16:25, <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/">Frank Goodman</a>.</i>]]></description>
			<link>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic1230/message5154/</link>
			<guid>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic1230/message5154/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:16:25 +0300</pubDate>
			<category>The Bat! - Templates and Macros</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
