<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>www.ritlabs.com [Topic: making a search out of a virtual folder]</title>
		<link>http://www.ritlabs.com</link>
		<description>New posts in making a search out of a virtual folder of  forum at www.ritlabs.com [www.ritlabs.com]</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss2</docs>
		<lastBuildDateTag>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:54:36 +0200</lastBuildDateTag>		<item>
			<title>making a search out of a virtual folder</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48416/">making a search out of a virtual folder</a></b> in forum <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/">The Bat! - Configuring the E-mail Client</a>. <br />
			Hi George, <br /><br />Greetings. &nbsp;I am not sure what is &quot;search engine indexing&quot; related to TheBat!. &nbsp;<br /><br />Presumably there is some Virtual Mailbox indexing.<br /><br />====================<br /><br />Here is a different improvement proposal.<br />For Ritlabs consideration:<br /><br />For Searching and Virtual Mailboxes.<br /><br />Allow Search for Subject and Recipient combined.<br />Or Subject and Recipient plus Subject. <br /><br />The reason would be to avoid full Header searches for speed and to leave out extraneous &quot;hits&quot;.<br /><br />Often you might have two or three search strings with an OR. &nbsp;<br />To do Sender and Recipient three becomes six lines. &nbsp;<br /><br />=================== <br />
			<i>19 November 2019 14:54:36, <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/">Steven   Avery</a>.</i>]]></description>
			<link>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48416/</link>
			<guid>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48416/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:54:36 +0200</pubDate>
			<category>The Bat! - Configuring the E-mail Client</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>making a search out of a virtual folder</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48391/">making a search out of a virtual folder</a></b> in forum <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/">The Bat! - Configuring the E-mail Client</a>. <br />
			Are you say about search engine indexing? <br />
			<i>18 November 2019 09:21:54, <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/">George Salnik</a>.</i>]]></description>
			<link>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48391/</link>
			<guid>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48391/</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:21:54 +0200</pubDate>
			<category>The Bat! - Configuring the E-mail Client</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>making a search out of a virtual folder</title>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48379/">making a search out of a virtual folder</a></b> in forum <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/">The Bat! - Configuring the E-mail Client</a>. <br />
			Here is a slightly quirky idea for a helpful improvement. <br /><br />FIrst, I notice that if you have many Virtual Mailboxes, it can take awhile for them to populate after the reboot. &nbsp;<br /><br />And I think there is a &quot;holdover&quot; flag .. &quot;Store State between Sessions&quot; but I have not seen it work, and I think I always have it checked yes. (This is an interesting question, if our readers can share their experiences on this, much appreciated. If I can get the holdover to work, the rest of this suggestion becomes not so consequential.)<br /><br />Beyond that, probably the best way to keep the time lag down (this also applies to the length of time of searches) is to avoid &quot;Text&quot; and &quot;Message Source&quot; &nbsp;and even &quot;Headers&quot; as the fields used. &nbsp;Try to use Sender, Recipient and Subject -- the scanning will be 100 times quicker. &nbsp;However, that is not always applicable, because often you would like to see also any reference in text to the item or person being searched. &nbsp;<br /><br />Let us say you reboot, and there is a Virtual Folder lag ... maybe an hour or more to completion. (I tend to reboot once or twice a day, just for crisper response time.) <br /><br />We know how easy, and helpful, it is to make a Virtual Folder out of a Search. &nbsp;Use it all the time. In those lag periods, the reverse would be superb. &nbsp;Make a search out of a Virtual Folder, automatically, without recreating line by line.<br /><br />Your thoughts? <br />
			<i>17 November 2019 15:18:28, <a href="http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/">Steven   Avery</a>.</i>]]></description>
			<link>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48379/</link>
			<guid>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum4/topic14458/message48379/</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 15:18:28 +0200</pubDate>
			<category>The Bat! - Configuring the E-mail Client</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
