http://www.ritlabs.com New posts in Template for Reply To (instead of Reply)? of forum at www.ritlabs.com [www.ritlabs.com] en http://backend.userland.com/rss2 Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:26:30 +0200 Template for Reply To (instead of Reply)? in forum The Bat! - Templates and Macros.
TB uses the address in the Reply-To header as recipient for replies. When it doesn't at your place then you must have overridden that default behaviour with macros. (Something like  %To=""%To="OFromAddr" could cause that)
05 December 2005 02:26:30, Roelof Otten.]]> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic2220/message9149/ http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic2220/message9149/ Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:26:30 +0200 The Bat! - Templates and Macros Template for Reply To (instead of Reply)? in forum The Bat! - Templates and Macros.
Many bulletin boards and list processors use Reply To as a mechanism for making sure that replies go to the board and not the original appender. The original message, as it appears on the board, has headers like..

From: joebloggs@fictional.com <Joe Bloggs>
To: sometopic@someboard.com <Some Bulletin Board>
Reply-To: sometopic@someboard.com
Subject: etc....

Setting up a reply template for "sometopic@someboard.com" is of no use since TB uses From: and not Reply-To: to determine the recipient. Is there any way of forcing the use of Reply-To: instead of From: for an address, or is this another feature request I should add?

Regards, John M
04 December 2005 20:04:19, John Mitchell.]]> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic2220/message9145/ http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forums/forum6/topic2220/message9145/ Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:04:19 +0200 The Bat! - Templates and Macros