memory footprint

Antifreeze User Posts: 51 Points: 45 Rating: 2 Authority: 2 Joined: 28 August 2006	#1 0 17 September 2006 14:02:20 Whether minimised or open, The Bat use 30mb of RAM. Isn't that a little large? I would like to have my email client running in the background most of the time that I'm working, but that is a substantial amount of my total memory. By comparison, I think Eudora used less than 3mb when minimised. Any comments?

Rick G Guru Posts: 774 Points: 2063 Rating: 53 Authority: 52 Joined: 23 July 2006	#2 0 17 September 2006 17:01:06 Mine is taking 42,580 right now

Gerry Doyon Beginner Posts: 3 Points: 1 Rating: 0 Authority: 0 Joined: 13 September 2006	#3 0 20 September 2006 18:52:47 Thunderbird 1.5.07 used about 42mb of memory. For me, this is normal. I wouldn't be concerned.

Old PMMail user Advanced User Posts: 60 Points: 54 Rating: 3 Authority: 3 Joined: 02 June 2006	#4 0 20 September 2006 18:59:19 Here I'm using only 5Mb. ----

michael walker User Posts: 37 Points: 27 Rating: 1 Authority: 1 Joined: 14 January 2006	#5 0 19 December 2006 19:59:40 mine's using <ahem> 60 MEGS ( maybe its the result of all that VIAGRA-SPAM??)

bigg one

Guru

Posts: 612 Points: 550 Rating: 14 Authority: 14 Joined: 02 February 2005

19 December 2006 21:59:13

I'm using TB for years and never checked this.
Now I did - after starting TB, it takes about 28MB (TB window has focus, Inbox folder active). If then I minimize it, it frees nearly everything - only ~1MB remains. If I then restore it again, it uses ~5MB.
If I open another folder, mem usage increases but never reaches the initial amount of 28MB.
Whenever I minimize it (to taskbar, not to tray), it always goes to ~1MB.

My mail folder is ~ 0.5GB, after a recent serious cleanup.

So the memory management seems to be pretty good - it does not occupy memory when loaded but inactive.

Maxim Masiutin Guru Posts: 644 Points: 1158 Rating: 25 Authority: 24 Joined: 09 September 2003	#7 0 20 December 2006 17:57:53 If you install the latest 3.95 version it should consume less memory and work faster.

michael walker User Posts: 37 Points: 27 Rating: 1 Authority: 1 Joined: 14 January 2006	#8 0 21 December 2006 01:58:48 3.95 (christmas edition) is quite DRAMATICALLY smaller in memory footprint... compared to the previous version, i'm down from 60+ megs to only 38 megs

Maxim Masiutin Guru Posts: 644 Points: 1158 Rating: 25 Authority: 24 Joined: 09 September 2003	#9 0 22 December 2006 22:26:47 Thank you, Michael! Did you also notice any speed increase in 3.95?

michael walker User Posts: 37 Points: 27 Rating: 1 Authority: 1 Joined: 14 January 2006	#10 0 23 December 2006 18:25:44 no speed increase was actually noticeable... and actually after running it a couple of hours, the memory footprint bloated back up to 60 megs again! (some kind of wierd memory leak?) Im just downloading the 3.95.03 update now.. and i'm hoping this fixes a couple of the critical errors that surfaced in 3.95.01

Maxim Masiutin Guru Posts: 644 Points: 1158 Rating: 25 Authority: 24 Joined: 09 September 2003	#11 0 24 December 2006 01:34:59 How do you observer the memory footprint? These figures mostly aren't showhing the real picture.

michael walker User Posts: 37 Points: 27 Rating: 1 Authority: 1 Joined: 14 January 2006	#12 0 25 December 2006 01:34:50 the same way i look at ANY applications memory footprint - the Windows Task Manager... screenshot

Products

Support

News

Company

Community