Quote |
---|
luis duarte wrote: try this it worked for me "C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat64.exe" /TLS_DISABLE_PERFECT_FORWARD_SECRECY" |
Thanks very much
Thanks very much |
|||
|
|
For more explanations:
|
|
|
|
I agree with complaints about the many off-topic messages about Ritlabs' upgrade policy. I have moved those to '
Carry on!
I volunteer as a moderator to help keep the forum tidy. I do not work for Ritlabs SRL.
|
|
|
|
"C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat64.exe" /TLS_DISABLE_PERFECT_FORWARD_SECRECY
Edited: |
|||
|
|
i'm edit the bat shortcut and it wont worked...
I create a new shortcut and it worked.. thank you everyone.. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Edited: |
|||
|
|
In an ECDSA signature, if a hash function had larger digest length (in bits) than the field size (which is not a good practice), The Bat! treated these signatures as invalid. It might lead to invalid ECC certificates, e.g. signed by "sha512ECDSA" algorithm. It might also lead to the following error: "TLS protocol error: Internal error BuildClientKeyExchange". For more information, see section 6.4 of FIPS.186-4 "ECDSA Digital Signature Generation and Verification": It is recommended that the security strength associated with the bit length of n and the security strength of the hash function be the same unless an agreement has been made between participating entities to use a stronger hash function. When the length of the output of the hash function is greater than the bit length of n, then the leftmost n bits of the hash function output block shall be used in any calculation using the hash function output during the generation or verification of a digital signature. A hash function that provides a lower security strength than the security strength associated with the bit length of n ordinarily should not be used, since this would reduce the security strength of the digital signature process to a level no greater than that provided by the hash function. |
|||
|
|
9-1-16 I can send messages with work of Avast. Guys who's have problem with AV (not only Avast) as me - please check it.
Модератор. Не являюсь сотрудником RitLabs (I'm not an employee of Ritlabs).
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
?????? Avast and other A/V programs are using a controversial hack to intercept and mess with the log-in process of e-mail clients. As a result, those clients sometimes stop functioning correctly. Just WHO should fix their software in such a case? I think Avast users have to be glad that Ritlabs took action at all and adapted its software to make it compatible with Avast's hack (For laughs, or cries, have a look at the troubles that the antivirus cowboys have been causing for
I volunteer as a moderator to help keep the forum tidy. I do not work for Ritlabs SRL.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Fellow forum user David Kirk made a tool for that. See
I volunteer as a moderator to help keep the forum tidy. I do not work for Ritlabs SRL.
|
|||
|
|
Thanks for posting that, Daniel. I updated that URL recently to also include reference to 7-Zip as some viewers had difficulty unzipping and keying in password with the default Windows unzip feature. There are also instructions on the steps to perform when moving to a new PC or after a crash.
david |
||||
|
|
|||